1 – Critical Thinking

 

 

Since ancient times, the concept of critical thinking has been associated with persuasive communication, usually in the form of speeches, scholarly texts, and literature.

Today, there are many vehicles for information and ideas, but the elements of critical thinking in a university context still bear strong influences from early scholarly writing and oration.

 

Definition of Critical Thinking

“Critical Thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.”

Source: https://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/about/criticalthinking/what

Critical thinking may seem very abstract in  definitions such as the one above, but it is, above all,  an action. One source says critical thinking “is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information” ( Skills You Need)  Most college curricula are designed to develop critical thinking.

“Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value … They will always seek to determine whether the ideas, arguments, and findings represent the entire picture and are open to the possibility that they do not. It is more than the accumulation of facts, it is a way of thinking.”

                                                                                                                                   (Source: Skills You Need)

In her article, “Why Are Critical Thinking Skills Necessary for Academics?,” journalist Jen Saunders  says, “universities concern the ways in which people research and write; their members are responsible for maintaining the foundational principles of truth and knowledge within the folds of scholarship, and permit scholars to grasp and comprehend academic subjects at levels of expertise.” (https://classroom.synonym.com/)

Saunders provides this information on the specific ways that critical thinking is important in  college-level work:

  • Critical thinking supplies the foundation of high-quality academic writing.
  • Peer awareness is an element of critical thinking in that it helps students understand and communicate with those who have different experiences, opinions, and perspectives.
  • Critical thinking are necessary for passing some exams (e.g.,  essay answer, a series of multiple-choice questions to test comprehension, and especially situations where students must look for context clues or decipher word elements).
  • When students are required to defend a thesis or dissertation, they need to be able to anticipate questions and respond on the spot to those asked by committee members.

Author and master teacher Michael Stratford (Demand Media), in his article, “What Are the Key Ideas for Critical Thinking Skills?”,  and the website, Skills You Need, note that someone with critical thinking skills can:

  • Interpret data – becoming aware of all of the parts of an argument, such as point of view, audience, and thesis as well as reasoning through moral dilemmas
  • Analyze and synthesize –  the ability to break down data into individual parts and reassemble them to create something original
  • Infer and answer:  the ability to explain a problem with an inference, or educated guess. This requires knowing the difference between explaining by inference or by assumptions based on previous ideas
  • Make Connections between ideas from varied sources
  • Recognize, build, and appraise arguments put forth by others and determine their importance and relevance through objective evaluation
  • Spot inconsistencies and errors in reasoning
  • Approach problems consistently and systematically
  • Reflect on the justification of one’s own assumptions, beliefs, and values

Indeed.com., a service for finding jobs and polishing a resume, provides the following information about critical thinking. Their website offers five types of skills are important:

Five Important Critical Thinking Skills

OBSERVATION

Observational skills are important for critical thinking because they help you to notice opportunities, problems, and solutions.  Eventually, good observers can predict  or anticipate problems or issues because their experience widens when they get in the habit of close observation. It is necessary to train yourself to pay close attention to details.

ANALYSIS

After you have spotted and identified a problem from your observation, your analytical skills become important: You must determine what part of a text or media is important and which parts are not. In other words,  gathering and evaluating sources of information that may support or depart from your text or media. This may involve a search for balanced research reports or scholarly work, and asking good questions about the text or media to make sure it is accurate and objective.

INFERENCE

Now that you have gathered information or data, you must now interpret it and find a solution or resolution.  Even though the information you have may be incomplete, just make an “educated guess,” rather than a quick conclusion.  Look for clues (images, symbolism, data charts, or reports) that will help you analyze a situation, so you can evaluate the text or situation and come to a measured conclusion.

COMMUNICATION

In the context of critical thinking, this means engaging or initiating discussions, particularly on difficult issues or questions, especially when you face an audience that you know disagrees with your position. Use your communication skills to persuade them. Active listening, remaining calm, and showing respect are very important elements of communicating with an audience.

PROBLEM SOLVING

The problem-solving part of critical thinking involves applying or executing a conclusion or solution. You will want to choose the best, so this requires a strong understanding of your topic or goal, as well as some idea of how others have handled similar situations.

Essential “Critical” Vocabulary

CRITICAL (adjective)
The word critical can be associated with saying something negative about a person, idea, thing or situation, and in another context, it can describe something that is important or serious.
CRITICIZE (verb)
The action of saying something negative about a person, idea, thing, or situation is the verb to “criticize.” For example, “She criticized her neighbor’s neglect of the garden.” This verb almost always refers to negative comments.
CRITIC (noun, person)
This word applies to a person who writes negative and/or positive evaluations of something as part of judging or evaluating a work or person. We commonly see this word associated with professional critics who write reviews of movies.
CRITICISM (noun)
The comments and opinions of a critic. It usually is a negative evaluation.It can also be a literary analysis, which is positive and negative. Example: Their main criticism of the plan was that it was impractical and too expensive. 
CRITIQUE (noun, verb)
This refers to the active of judging or evaluating someone’s work. It also refers to the work of the judge. The critic’s assessment can be positive or negative. For example: He was asked by the publisher to review the book before it was published.

[Source:  (https://www.espressoenglish.net/difference-between-criticize-criticism-critique-critic-and-critical/]

Now let’s examine the many ways the word “critical” is used in various academic contents. You might be familiar with movie reviews or customer reviews on products in which a critic offers comments.  Below are some reviews of a long-standing Chinese restaurant in Columbus, Hunan Lion:

  • The restaurant is over priced. You pay for the atmosphere. Ordered the beef and oriental veggies and to be honest it was onions and 3 pieces of broccoli. The meat was fatty and that is the worst. Typically the food is good but last night it wasn’t.

  • 35 years of incredible food. By far the best Chinese restaurant in Columbus. If you want to have a great experience, without a doubt go there, you will love it.
  • We ordered take out 10/01/2020. Food was TERRIBLE! The Crab Rangoon…well it’s not crab and I’m not sure of the texture it had going on but it was disgusting! The entire order of food after 1 bite went in the trash! I will certainly spread the word DO NOT ORDER FOOD from this restaurant! They are expensive and you are wasting your money. The girl at the cash register surpasses RUDE.
  • The food and service were fantastic! We were in on Christmas day, and despite being busy, they did a magnificent job. We will definitely be back!

These reviews were voluntary; nevertheless, the writers of them are considered “critics,” because what they are really offering is judgment.

In a professional or academic setting, critics do much more than give a strong opinion. Whether they offer positive or negative comments, they all try to do so as objectively as possible. In other words, they avoid Personal Bias, meaning they try not to rely exclusively on their personal experiences, but rather they include influences from people, environments, cultures, values, stereotypes, and beliefs.

 

Statue of Justice

It is worth noting that all of these influences are part of being human. Part of critical thinking, however, means acknowledging the impact your own biases may have on the questions you ask or your interpreting of material; then, learn to overcome these evaluations. You must be like a judge in a courtroom:  you have to try to be fair and leave your own feeling out of the situation.
ACTIVITY #1:
INFERENCE EXERCISE
Harper’s is the oldest general-interest monthly magazine in the U.S. It emphasizes excellent writing and unique and varied perspectives. One of its most celebrated features is the “Harper’s Index,” which is a collection of random statistics about  politics, business, human behavior, social trends, research findings, and so forth. The reader is left alone to make sense of a fact by using inferences and background knowledge.
Below are some statistics from “Harper’s Index.” It is up to you to decide what each statistic suggests. Something surprising? Mysterious? What could explain its significance?

Choose a few of the facts below and write a response for each in which you raise questions, offer a possible explanation, or propose a tentative theory to explain the fact, or its significance.  Consider what the statistic suggests beyond what is written. Your response should be your own opinion, without consulting any internet resources or others.

 

Example:    Percentage increase last year in UFO sightings nationwide:   16%

Source: [July 2021 • Source: National UFO Reporting Center (Davenport,Wash.)]

Response:

Is this a large or small increase? Maybe the  increase is due to the recent U.S. government’s release of a file on unidentified flying objects (UFOs), or, what they call, “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.” Maybe people feel like they can admit to seeing such phenomena since the government now acknowledges their existence? In the recent past, perhaps people would be laughed at or stigmatized if they claimed to see a UFO because the government and general public believed the idea of “alien life forms”  was ridiculous.

 

Amount the state of West Virginia will pay
prospective residents to move to the state:   $12,000

Souce:  December 2021 Source: Brad and Alys Smith Outdoor Economic Development Collaborative (Morgantown, W.Va.)

Response:

 

Portion of Americans with graduate degrees
who believe in ghosts:   
1/3

Source:  February 2022 • Source: Gradient Metrics (NYC)

Response:

Percentage by which elderly patients are more
likely to die during or after emergency surgery
performed on the surgeon’s birthday:  23%

Source:  March 2021 • Source: Yusuke Tsugawa, University of California, Los Angeles

Response:

Minimum number of U.S. colleges and universities
that track prospective students’ web activity:  33

January 2020 • Source: Washington Post

Response:

Percentage by which people who nap
once or twice a week are less likely than
non-nappers to face serious heart illnesses:  48%

Source:  December 2019 • Source: Nadine Häusler, University of Lausanne (Switzerland)

Response:

 
Percentage by which the unemployment
rate of recently graduated U.S. physics
majors exceeds that of art history majors:  60%

Source:  November 2020 • Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

 

Response:

 
ACTIVITY #2 – LINKING FACTS

Sometimes the “Harper’s Index” features pairs of statistics.  It is up to you to decide what the pair, seen together, suggests. Select a couple of the pairs below and write down questions you may have, or possible explanations that tell why the pair might be significant.  Consider what the statistic suggests beyond what is written. What you write should be your own opinion, without consulting any internet resources or others.

Type your response below each set:

FACTS
SOURCES
Estimated number of fake businesses removed from Google Maps in 2020: 3,000,000
Minimum number of fake reviews on Google: 107,000,000
January 2022 • Source: Google (Mountain View, Calif.)

January 2022 • Source: Uberall (Berlin)

Response:

Portion of adults who believe that U.S. crime has increased in the past year: 3/5
Percentage change in the number of major crimes in the United States in the past year: -5
January 2022 • Source: YouGov

Response:

Percentage of number-one pop songs that credited a single songwriter in 1990: 40
In 2020: 0
June 2021 • Source: Billboard (NYC)
Response:

Percentage change in the win rate of professional soccer teams playing at home when the stadium is empty: -23
In the penalty rate: +21

 

October 2020 • Source: Gracenote (Nieuwegein, the Netherlands) <

October 2020 • Source: Impect (Cologne, Germany)

Response:

Percentage of Americans aged 18 to 34 who say they have witnessed ageism in the workplace: 52
Of Americans aged 55 and older: 39

 

February 2020 • Source: Glassdoor (Mill Valley, Calif.)
Response:

Rank of Americans among nationalities most likely to say their country is the best in the world: 1
Factor by which more Americans died in school shootings than in combat last year: 3

 

August 2019 • Source: YouGov

August 2019 • Source: Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School (Monterey, Calif.)/U.S. Department of Defense

Response:

Rank of Arabic among France’s most spoken languages: 2
Percentage of French students who study Arabic in secondary school: 0.2

 

April 2019 • Source: Embassy of France in the United States (Washington)

April 2019 • Source: French Ministry of National Education (Paris)

Response:

Percentage of Americans aged 18 to 34 who say they’d like to live forever: 24
Of Americans over 55: 13

 

April 2019 • Source: YouGov
Response:

Number of fact-checking organizations that were active in 2014: 103
That are active today: 225

 

March 2020 • Source: Bill Adair, Duke University (Durham, N.C.)
Response:

Percentage of Americans aged 18 to 24 who believe in soul mates: 54
Of Americans over 55 who do: 55

 

April 2020 • Source:YouGov (NYC)
Response:

 

Movie Reviews

One of the most familiar types of criticism we encounter is a movie review,  a short description of a film and the reviewer’s opinion about it. When you watch a movie on Netflix, for example, you can see the number of stars (1-5) given by those who have watched and rated the movie. Professional reviewers usually try to give a formal, balanced account of a movie, meaning they usually provide a summary and point out some positive and negative points about a film. Amateur critics, however, can write whatever they like – all positive, all negative, or a combination.

Amateur film critiques can be found in many places; the movie review site, IMDB, is one of the most popular, with a user-generated rating feature.  Another popular site is Rotten Tomatoes, which uses a unique ‘tomato meter’ to rate movies: a green tomato means fresh while red means rotten. You can also view the individual ratings given by critics. It has more than 50,000 movies in its database. And finally, another good source of movie reviews is Metacritic, which offers a collection of reviews from various sources.

Let’s look at this review by professional movie critic Roger Ebert (https://www.rogerebert.com/

In “Top Gun: Maverick,” a sequel to “Top Gun,” an admiral refers to navy aviator Pete Mitchell (Tom Cruise)—call sign “Maverick”—as “the fastest man alive.” Truth be told, our fearless and ever-handsome action hero earns both appraisals and applause.  Indeed, Cruise’s consistent commitment to Hollywood showmanship deserves the same level of respect usually reserved for the fully-method actors such as Daniel Day-Lewis. Even if you somehow overlook the fact that Cruise is one of our most gifted and versatile dramatic and comedic actors with movies like “Mission Impossible,”  “Born on the Fourth of July,” “Magnolia,” “Tropic Thunder,” and “Collateral” on his CV, you will never forget why you show up to a Tom Cruise movie.

Director Joseph Kosinski allows the leading actor to be exactly what he is—a star—while upping the emotional and dramatic stakes of the first Top Gun (1986) with a healthy dose of nostalgia.  In this Top Gun sequel, we find Maverick in a role on the fringes of the US Navy, working as a test pilot. You won’t be surprised that soon enough, he gets called on a one-last-job type of mission as a teacher to a group of recent training graduates. Their assignment is just as obscure and politically cuckoo as it was in the first movie. There is an unnamed enemy—let’s called it Russia because it’s probably Russia—some targets that need to be destroyed, a flight plan that sounds nuts, and a scheme that will require all successful Top Gun recruits to fly at dangerously low altitudes. But can it be done?

In a different package, all the proud fist-shaking seen in “Top Gun: Maverick” could have been borderline insufferable, but fortunately Kosinski seems to understand exactly what kind of movie he is asked to navigate. In his hands, the tone of “Maverick” strikes a fine balance between good-humored vanity and half-serious self-deprecation, complete with plenty of emotional moments that catch one off-guard.

In some sense, what this movie takes most seriously are concepts like friendship, loyalty, romance, and okay, bromance.  Still, the action sequences are likewise the breathtaking stars of “Maverick.” Reportedly, all the flying scenes were shot in actual U.S. Navy F/A-18s, for which the cast had to be trained. Equally worthy of that big screen is the emotional strokes of “Maverick” that pack an unexpected punch. Sure, you might be prepared for a second sky-dance with “Maverick,” but perhaps not one that might require a tissue or two in its final stretch.

Available in theaters May 27th, 2022

 

ACTIVITY #3 – BEING A CRITIC

Analyze the film review above.  Does the reviewer give the movie a strongly positive or negative review? A mildly positive or negative review? A balanced review? How can you tell?  Support your opinion by identifying words, phases, and/or comparisons that directly or indirectly are positive, negative, or neutral.

ACTIVITY #3 – BEING A CRITIC

Analyze the film review above.  Does the reviewer give the movie a strongly positive or negative review? A mildly positive or negative review? A balanced review? How can you tell?  Support your opinion by identifying words, phases, and/or comparisons that directly or indirectly are positive, negative, or neutral.

ACTIVITY #4 – WRITE A MOVIE REVIEW

Select a movie to review. Choose one you either love or hate. (If it evokes emotions, it’s usually easier to review.) You may choose any movie, but for this assignment, don’t choose a film that might upset your target audience – your instructor and classmates. A movie review can be long or short.  Usually a simple outline of the plot and a sentence or two about the general setting in which it takes place will be sufficient, then add your opinion and analysis. The opinion section should be the main focus of your review. Don’t get too detailed. Your instructor will determine the word limit of this assignment.

Suggestions:

Do a web search to find information about the film: is it based on real-life events or is it fiction?

 

Find some information about the director and his/her/their style.

 

Look for information about the cast, the budget, the filming location, and where the idea for the film’s story came from. In other words, why did the producers want to make the movie?

 

Be sure to keep notes on where you find each piece of information – its source.  Most of the facts about movies are considered common knowledge, so they don’t have to be included in your review.

 

Avoid reading other reviews. They might influence your opinion, and that kind of information needs to be cited in a review.

 

When you are watching the film make notes of important scenes or details, symbolism, or the performances of the characters. You may want to analyze these in detail later. Again, keep notes on the source of the information you find.

 

Don’t give away the ending! Remember, reviews help readers decide whether or not to watch the movie. No spoilers!

Suggested Steps:

Write an introduction where you include all the basic information so that the film can be easily identified. Note the name, the director, main cast, and the characters in the story, along with the year it was made. Briefly provide the main idea of the film.

Write the main body. Analyze the story, the acting, and the director’s style. Discuss anything you would have done differently, a technique that was successful, or dialogue that was important. In other words, here is where you convey your opinion and the reasons for it. You may choose to analyze in detail one scene from the film that made an impression on you, or you may focus on an actor’s performance, or the film’s setting, music, light, character development, or dialogu

Make a conclusion. Search for several reviews of the film. Include how the film was rated by others. You will need to include information about where you found the information. Then, give your own opinion and your recommendation. You can end with a reason the audience might enjoy it or a reason you do not recommend it. Include a summary of the reasons you recommend or do not recommend it.

[Source:  https://academichelp.net/academic-assignments/review/write-film-review.html]

————————————————

References:

10 Top Critical Thinking Skills (and how to improve them).(2022).  Indeed.com: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/critical-thinking-skills

Difference between criticize, criticism, critique, critic, and critical. Espresso English:
https://www.espressoenglish.net/difference-between-criticize-criticism-critique-critic-and-critical/

Hansen, R.S. (n.d.).  Ways in which college is different from high school.  My CollegeSuccessStory.com.

Ideas to Action. Critical Thinking Inventories. University of Louisville:  https://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/about/criticalthinking/what

Saunders, J. (n.d.). “Why Are Critical Thinking Skills Necessary for Academics?,” Demand Media.

Stratford, M. (n.d. ) What are the key ideas for critical thinking skills? Demand Media.

Van Zyl, M.A., Bays, C.L., & Gilchrist, C. (2013). Assessing teaching critical thinking with validated critical thinking inventories: The learning critical thinking inventory (LCTI) and the teaching critical thinking inventory (TCTI). Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across The Discipline, 28(3), 40-50.

What is Critical Thinking? (n.d.). Skills You Need: https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/critical-thinking.html

Write a Film Review. Academic Help: Write Better: https://academichelp.net/academic-assignments/review/write-film-review.html

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Critical Reading, Writing, and Thinking Copyright © 2022 by Zhenjie Weng, Josh Burlile, Karen Macbeth is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book