Temple of Khons, RAMSES III, Egyptian, KARNAK, Egypt, 1150 BC

Drawings of Temple of Khons

Plan, section, and cutaway drawings of the Temple of Khons

The entry to Temple of Khons is the composed of two tall trapezoidal elements with open entry in the center (image 1). The section drawing best reveals the height difference of the pylon. This partition separates secular space preceding entry from the sacred space behind the pylon. Many linear Egyptian projects lack a vertical emphasis. The pylon is one exception. This vertical element at the entry sequence masks the scale and contents of the temple beyond the pylon and creates a sense of drama and suspense. The pylon also adds to the frontal and hierarchical design of the project, more to be elaborated following.

Image 1: Pylon Entry

The other vertical element at Temple of Khons is an , one solid, non-occupiable piece of stone. The obelisk is unique to Temple of Khons, compared to the other Egyptian projects in this book. The obelisk creates an and creates a connection from the heavens to the earth. A reminder, though other topics in this book feature obelisks, the original iteration of obelisks was first created in Egypt. Later, the Classical Romans removed obelisks from Egypt to their most important civic and religious buildings. The third iteration of obelisks was in Rome again when the obelisks were moved to highlight the Baroque Roman Planning and religious buildings.

This organization of the first drawing set shows the section aligning with the plan below. The plan reinforces one clear AXIS along the center organizing a spatial HIERARCHY. Beyond the pylon, the next space is the , a hall full of columns. At Temple of Khons, the first hypostyle hall is both interior and exterior with a voided space in the middle open to the sky. The hypostyle hall is a symbol of Egyptian structural limitations. Though this culture created a vast scale of projects, occupiable interior space did not match exterior grandeur. The hypostyle hall is the desire to create large interior spaces, with or without a roof. The tension of the beams above the columns was a challenge; therefore, the columns were spaced close together with minimal to resolve this issue. As builders evolve further structural sophistications, intercolumniation expands between structure creating more open interiors. The trajectory of limited interior space and limited light that continues to expand throughout history is dependent upon structural innovations (image 2).

Ruins of temple of khonsu

Image 2: Ruins showing column structures of temple

One major structural innovation reducing the number of columns is the , the opening at the top of a column. The opening of the column at the top increases surface area and allows more weight to be transferred by each individual column. The importance of the capital is a structural innovation widening the space between and further reducing the number of columns. This creates larger, more open interior spaces. When these structural innovations occur, there are often efforts to create a more pleasing aesthetic. An interesting lineage of this idea is the depiction of vegetative elements on both Egyptian and Greek capitals.  The Egyptians return to the river Nile and earlier building materials and plants found at the base of the Nile, including papyrus buds and lotus flowers. They employ these shapes and imagery on the capitals to represent Upper (papyrus buds) and Lower Egypt (lotus flower).


Proceeding past the large scale of the hypostyle hall is a dramatic set of spatial sequences connected by a central axis defining . The hierarchy of the smaller scale of the is reinforced by in both plan and section. At Temple of Khons, the telescoping is decreasing with wall placement, in addition to ceiling height reducing and floor level raising (see section). These effects reinforce a compression to minimal scale of the sanctuary. The stepping of the ceiling height allows for a light to selectively illuminate the interior. The axonometric at the top of the drawing set shows how the light can slip in between the structural elements.

Temple of Khons was built upon a , a clean slate. It is an temple, bringing all materials to the site, a comparison to Temple of Ramesses II. At Temple of Khons, there is a layering of further zones of hierarchy outside of the inner most temple. Several bands of concentric zones demonstrate a layering of hierarchy. There is a clear procession reinforcing the hierarchy of the sanctuary.  Of note for all the Egyptian projects, these tremendous building projects required large labor forces for the scale of projects. Often during Egyptian times, towns developed in proximity to these building sites.

As later civilizations build larger interior spaces, each culture develops new sensibilities and distinct characteristics. Later cultures develop techniques to build larger and/or taller, featuring more light illuminating the interior. The scale of Egyptian architecture is , inspiring later civilizations to achieve their monumentality. Today the mysteries of what the Egyptians designed and constructed continues to develop many questions and research to better understand this sophisticated culture (image 3).

Temple of Khons ruins

Image 3: Ruins of Egyptian architecture


Media Attributions


Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Exploring Architecture and Landscape Architecture Copyright © by Aimee Moore is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book